#71
中等
Agree or Disagree

社会

全球食品超市发展利弊

预计阅读时间: 15 分钟
字数: 2383 字符
Economy

题目

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

高分范文

In recent years, the globalization of food markets has allowed consumers in many countries to purchase food products from around the world in their local supermarkets. While this phenomenon offers certain benefits, such as increased variety and access to exotic products, it also brings about significant drawbacks, including environmental concerns and potential impacts on local economies. On balance, I believe that this development is more negative than positive.

Firstly, one of the major advantages of this global food market is the increased variety available to consumers. People can enjoy exotic fruits, vegetables, and other food items that are not native to their country, thus enriching their culinary experiences. This accessibility also allows for a more balanced diet, as consumers have access to a wider range of nutrients from diverse food sources. Moreover, it can lead to increased cultural exchange and understanding, as people learn about different cuisines and traditions through the foods they consume.

However, the negatives of this development are significant. The transportation of food products across the globe contributes to environmental degradation. The carbon footprint associated with the shipping and handling of these goods is substantial, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbating climate change. For instance, the airfreight of perishable goods like fruits and vegetables involves considerable energy consumption and pollution.

Additionally, the global availability of food products can adversely affect local economies. Local farmers and producers may struggle to compete with large international companies that can offer lower prices due to economies of scale. This competition can lead to the decline of local agriculture, resulting in job losses and economic instability within rural communities. It can also lead to a loss of cultural heritage, as traditional farming practices and local food varieties may be overshadowed by imported goods.

In conclusion, while the ability to purchase food from around the world in local supermarkets has its perks, the environmental costs and economic impacts on local communities make this trend a predominantly negative development. It is crucial for policymakers to consider these factors and promote sustainable practices that support local economies while minimizing environmental harm.

中文翻译

近年来,随着食品市场的全球化,许多国家的消费者可以在当地超市购买来自世界各地的食品。虽然这种现象带来了一些好处,例如增加了品种和获取异国产品的机会,但也带来了显著的缺点,包括环境问题和对当地经济的潜在影响。总的来说,我认为这是一种负面多于正面的发展。

首先,这种全球食品市场的主要优势之一是消费者可获得的品种增多。人们可以享用本国没有的异国水果、蔬菜和其他食品,从而丰富了他们的饮食体验。这种便利也使得消费者能够获得更均衡的饮食,因为他们可以从多元化的食品来源中获取更广泛的营养。此外,还可以促进文化交流和理解,因为人们通过消费食物了解不同的烹饪和传统。

然而,这一发展的负面影响是显著的。食品产品在全球范围内运输会对环境造成损害。与这些商品的运输和处理相关的碳足迹是巨大的,增加了温室气体排放,加剧了气候变化。例如,易腐烂食品如水果和蔬菜的空运涉及大量的能源消耗和污染。

此外,食品产品的全球供应可能对当地经济产生不利影响。当地农民和生产商可能难以与能够因规模经济而提供更低价格的大型国际公司竞争。这种竞争可能导致当地农业的衰退,造成农村社区的失业和经济不稳定。这也可能导致文化遗产的丧失,因为传统的农业实践和地方食品品种可能会被进口商品所掩盖。

总之,虽然在当地超市购买世界各地的食品有其好处,但环境成本和对当地社区经济的影响使这一趋势成为一种主要负面的发展。政策制定者必须考虑这些因素,并促进支持地方经济的可持续做法,同时尽量减少对环境的危害。

重点词汇

globalization
全球化
culinary
烹饪的
carbon footprint
碳足迹
greenhouse gas emissions
温室气体排放
economies of scale
规模经济
cultural heritage
文化遗产

语法解析

原句:The carbon footprint associated with the shipping and handling of these goods is substantial, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbating climate change.

翻译:这些商品的运输和处理相关的碳足迹是巨大的,增加了温室气体排放,加剧了气候变化。


语法分析


主语 (Subject): The carbon footprint(碳足迹)
谓语 (Verb): is(是)
形容词短语 (Adjective phrase): substantial(巨大的)
现在分词短语 (Present participle phrase): increasing greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbating climate change(增加温室气体排放并加剧气候变化)

这句话的主要结构是“主语 + 谓语 + 形容词短语”,描述了碳足迹的影响。后接的“现在分词短语”用于说明碳足迹带来的后果,表示持续增加的温室气体排放和加剧的气候变化。