题目
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
高分范文
The debate over whether children should be given the autonomy to make decisions on everyday matters is a recurring one. On one hand, some argue that allowing children to make their own choices may lead to a self-centered society, while on the other hand, it is believed that this autonomy is crucial for their development. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before presenting my own opinion.
Proponents of restricting children's decision-making argue that too much freedom can foster a generation that prioritizes personal desires above communal or familial responsibilities. When children are allowed to choose their food, clothes, and entertainment without guidance, they may develop a sense of entitlement, believing their preferences should always come first. This can lead to selfish behavior and a lack of consideration for others, potentially resulting in a society where collaboration and empathy are undervalued.
Conversely, advocates for allowing children to make decisions emphasize the importance of fostering independence and critical thinking skills from a young age. When children are entrusted with decision-making, they learn to evaluate options and consider the consequences of their actions. This empowerment can enhance their self-esteem and prepare them for the complexities of adult life. For example, a child who is allowed to choose their own clothes might develop a sense of personal style and confidence, which are essential traits in social interactions.
In my opinion, a balanced approach should be adopted. While it is important for children to have a say in matters that affect them, guidance from parents or guardians is crucial to ensure that their choices are informed and considerate. By setting boundaries and encouraging discussion, children can learn the value of compromise and the importance of considering the needs of others while still developing their decision-making skills. This balance can cultivate well-rounded individuals who are both independent and empathetic, contributing positively to society.
中文翻译
关于是否应该让儿童在日常事务上拥有决策权的问题一直存在争议。一方面，有人认为允许儿童做出自己的选择可能会导致一个以自我为中心的社会，而另一方面，有人认为这种自主性对于他们的发展至关重要。本文将讨论这两种观点，并提出我自己的看法。
限制儿童决策权的支持者认为，过多的自由可能会培养出一代人，他们将个人愿望置于集体或家庭责任之上。当儿童在没有指导的情况下选择食物、衣服和娱乐时，他们可能会产生一种特权感，认为自己的偏好应该始终优先。这可能导致自私行为和对他人的漠视，进而导致一个不重视合作和同情的社会。
相反，支持让儿童自主决策的人强调从小培养独立性和批判性思维能力的重要性。当儿童被信任做出决策时，他们学会评估选项并考虑行动的后果。这种赋权可以提升他们的自尊心，为成年生活的复杂性做好准备。例如，一个被允许选择自己衣服的孩子可能会发展出一种个人风格和自信，这些都是社交互动中必不可少的特质。
在我看来，应采取一种平衡的方法。虽然让儿童参与影响他们的事务很重要，但来自父母或监护人的指导至关重要，以确保他们的选择是明智和体贴的。通过设定界限和鼓励讨论，儿童可以学习妥协的重要性以及考虑他人需求的重要性，同时发展他们的决策能力。这种平衡可以培养出既独立又富有同情心的全面发展的人，从而对社会做出积极贡献。
重点词汇
语法解析
原句：When children are allowed to choose their food, clothes, and entertainment without guidance, they may develop a sense of entitlement, believing their preferences should always come first.
翻译：当儿童在没有指导的情况下选择食物、衣服和娱乐时，他们可能会产生一种特权感，认为自己的偏好应该始终优先。
语法分析
这句话的主要结构是条件状语从句 "When children are allowed..."，描述了条件下可能发生的结果。主句 "they may develop..." 说明了可能发展的结果。宾语从句 "believing their preferences..." 进一步解释了特权感的表现形式。