题目
Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
高分范文
The issue of animal extinction is one that has sparked considerable debate. On one hand, some argue that both countries and individuals have a responsibility to protect endangered species. On the other hand, there is a viewpoint that prioritizing human-related issues should take precedence. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Proponents of protecting endangered species often emphasize the ecological balance and biodiversity that animals contribute to. Animals play integral roles in ecosystems, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and maintaining food chains. If a species becomes extinct, it can lead to unforeseen consequences, potentially disrupting ecosystems and leading to further extinctions. Moreover, many people believe that humans have a moral obligation to protect the other creatures inhabiting the planet. This perspective often highlights that human activities, such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change, are primary causes of the rapid increase in extinction rates. As such, it is argued that efforts must be made to mitigate these impacts and preserve wildlife.
Conversely, those who believe that human issues should take precedence argue that with limited resources, it is more pragmatic to focus on urgent human needs such as poverty, health care, and education. They contend that addressing these issues can lead to a more stable and prosperous society, which might subsequently enable better conservation efforts. Additionally, there is a belief that technological advancements and economic growth can ultimately provide solutions to both human and environmental problems, suggesting a more integrated approach could be beneficial.
In my opinion, a balanced approach is crucial. While human issues undeniably require attention, the protection of endangered species is also essential. The two are not mutually exclusive; indeed, many solutions to human problems, such as sustainable development and green technologies, can simultaneously aid animal conservation. Therefore, a dual focus that integrates both human and environmental needs is the most effective strategy moving forward.
中文翻译
动物灭绝问题引发了广泛的争论。一方面,有人认为国家和个人有责任保护濒危物种。另一方面,也有人认为应该优先解决人类相关问题。本文将讨论这两种观点,然后提出我自己的看法。
保护濒危物种的支持者通常强调动物对生态平衡和生物多样性的贡献。动物在生态系统中扮演着重要角色,如授粉、种子传播和维持食物链。如果一个物种灭绝,可能会导致不可预见的后果,潜在地破坏生态系统并导致进一步的灭绝。此外,许多人相信人类有道德义务保护地球上其他生物。这个观点常常强调人类活动,如森林砍伐、污染和气候变化,是导致灭绝率快速增长的主要原因。因此,有人认为必须采取措施减轻这些影响并保护野生动物。
相反,认为人类问题应该优先的人则认为,在资源有限的情况下,更务实的方法是关注迫切的人类需求,如贫困、医疗和教育。他们主张解决这些问题可以带来更稳定和繁荣的社会,从而可能更好地进行保护工作。此外,有人相信技术进步和经济增长最终可以提供解决人类和环境问题的方案,建议一种更为综合的方法可能更有益。
我认为,平衡的方法至关重要。虽然人类问题无疑需要关注,但保护濒危物种也同样重要。两者并不相互排斥;事实上,解决人类问题的许多方案,如可持续发展和绿色技术,可以同时帮助动物保护。因此,整合人类和环境需求的双重关注是未来最有效的策略。
重点词汇
语法解析
原句:Animals play integral roles in ecosystems, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and maintaining food chains. If a species becomes extinct, it can lead to unforeseen consequences, potentially disrupting ecosystems and leading to further extinctions.
翻译:动物在生态系统中扮演着重要角色,如授粉、种子传播和维持食物链。如果一个物种灭绝,可能会导致不可预见的后果,潜在地破坏生态系统并导致进一步的灭绝。
语法分析
- 主语 (Subject): Animals
- 谓语 (Verb): play
- 宾语 (Object): integral roles
- 连接词 (Conjunction): If
- 主语 (Subject): a species
- 谓语 (Verb): becomes
- 表语 (Complement): extinct
- 主语 (Subject): it
- 谓语 (Verb): can lead
- 宾语 (Object): to unforeseen consequences
这段话描述了动物在生态系统中的关键作用及其灭绝可能带来的结果。主句描述了动物的作用,条件从句假设物种灭绝后的后果,并列举了可能的结果。